Visit iarnuocon's column >>

IARNUOCON

That's nice... Prove it.
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 282; Links Seeded: 1178
Member Since: 6/2006Last Seen: 11/23/2009

GOP sound and fury about ACORN is a little bit nutty

advertisement

In the wake of allegations about the use of foreclosure lists to challenge voters at the polls, the Michigan GOP and the McCain campaign are issuing charges of voter fraud against the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), a national nonprofit group that has been organizing in neighborhoods around the country for years. But a review of the allegations, along with interviews with independent political observers, shows the charges are largely baseless.

...Danforth and other ACORN critics note correctly that a significant number — typically around 30 percent — of those voter registration applications end up being rejected. About 3 percent to 5 percent of the applications collected are rejected because they're incomplete, and less than 1 percent are deemed illegible. About 25 percent of applications are rejected because they are duplicates.

But the rejection rate is not a sign of wrongdoing, say voting experts.

...Gerald Hebert, a retired U.S. Department of Justice voting rights expert who served under Republican and Democratic presidents, says the kind of fraud that the GOP is charging ACORN with — deliberately registering fictitious people or registering the same person in two different precincts — is extremely rare. Hebert is now executive director of the Campaign Legal Center in Washington. The nonprofit organization was founded by Trevor Potter, who represents the McCain campaign in lawsuits over voter suppression.

In the case of ACORN activists convicted of fraud in Missouri, Hebert says ACORN itself had "actually turned those people in to the local district attorney and to the feds, saying these people had been engaging in fictitious registration forms. None of those people actually voted, and none of them even got registered, because ACORN called attention to the fact that these were likely bogus applications."

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
4.5
{"commentId":3244973,"authorDomain":"iarnuocon"}

GOP voter suppression is both far more prevalent and far easier to prove than supposed Democrat fraudulent voting. So says Gerald Hebert. But what would he know? He's just a voting rights expert.

{"commentId":3244973,"threadId":"374895","contentId":"1941292","authorDomain":"iarnuocon"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Oct 1, 2008 3:47 PM EDT
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"374895","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"374895","contentId":"1941292"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking