Visit iarnuocon's column >>

IARNUOCON

That's nice... Prove it.
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 282; Links Seeded: 1183
Member Since: 6/2006Last Seen: 11/26/2009

Bush, Jefferson, and the Theocratization of America

advertisement

On July 4th, 2008, George Bush made a speech at Monticello, former home of Thomas Jefferson, about America, its freedoms and history. Much has been made of protesters arrested, but few have seen fit to parse his words. It may be an indication of his lame duck status, or of his perpetually flagging popularity, or merely an acknowledgment of the fact that Mr. Bush does not (can not?) write his own speeches. Nevertheless, his words, delivered with the predictable missteps and contempt for truth and history we have come to expect from this Presidency, deserve at least a little scrutiny.

We honor Jefferson's legacy by aiding the rise of liberty in lands that do not know the blessings of freedom. And on this Fourth of July, we pay tribute to the brave men and women who wear the uniform of the United States of America.

It is laudable to want to honor the men and women of our armed forces, for they do seek to preserve the rights and freedom of America's citizens. It is, however, more than a little duplicitous to claim to be honoring "Jefferson's legacy" by foreign adventurism when Jefferson was so clearly opposed to entangling the welfare of the United States with the interests of foreign nations. Jefferson himself said, in his first inaugural address in 1801

"Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations--entangling alliances with none, I deem [one of] the essential principles of our government, and consequently [one of] those which ought to shape its administration.".

Nor was that the end of his caution against America becoming embroiled in foreign adventures. Among many quotes counseling against such entanglements, Jefferson wrote to George Logan that

"It ought to be the very first object of our pursuits to have nothing to do with the European interests and politics. Let them be free or slaves at will, navigators or agriculturists, swallowed into one government or divided into a thousand, we have nothing to fear from them in any form."

The usage of Jefferson to justify the very thing Jefferson hoped to keep our country from engaging in seems particularly blockheaded, and one wonders whether such a ploy is the result of the ignorance of Bush's speech writers, or of their confidence in the ignorance of his listeners.

And yet it only gets worse...

After many years of war, the United States won its independence. The principles that Thomas Jefferson enshrined in the Declaration became the guiding principles of the new nation. And at every generation, Americans have rededicated themselves to the belief that all men are created equal, with the God-given right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. (Applause.)

Thomas Jefferson understood that these rights do not belong to Americans alone. They belong to all mankind. And he looked to the day when all people could secure them.

Certainly, Jefferson cited "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" and laid the concept of unalienable rights at the feet of "their Creator", but it would be a stretch to contend that Jefferson attributed those rights to God as much as to their presence as natural rights. "The Creator" entered into a Jeffersonian formulation of rights only inasmuch as he believed in a deistic, impersonal God who created nature's laws. Men's rights, as Jefferson wrote on more than one occasion, were natural rights

"Man [is] a rational animal, endowed by nature with rights and with an innate sense of justice." Jefferson to William Johnson, 1823

"A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate." Rights of British America, 1774.

Under the law of nature, all men are born free, every one comes into the world with a right to his own person, which includes the liberty of moving and using it at his own will. Legal Argument, 1770

Perhaps most distressing is the clear elision of Jefferson's own opinions about religion from the quote which is then used to bolster the notion that rights originate from God:

On the 50th anniversary of America's independence, Thomas Jefferson passed away. But before leaving this world, he explained that the principles of the Declaration of Independence were universal. In one of the final letters of his life, he wrote, "May it be to the world, what I believe it will be -- to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all -- the Signal of arousing men to burst the chains, and to assume the blessings and security of self-government."

That quote from Jefferson was lifted (in part) from Jefferson's letter to Roger Weightman, as America approached the 50th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. But the part that is curiously missing sets it in contrast to the aim which George Bush gives it. In whole, Jefferson stated

"May it be to the world, what I believe it will be, (to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all,) the signal of arousing men to burst the chains under which monkish ignorance and superstition had persuaded them to bind themselves, and to assume the blessings and security of self-government."

Jefferson had no taste for the pronouncements of religion or for religious hierarchies; and it seems a bit of pernicious legerdemain to enlist Jefferson's words in an underhanded campaign to bolster the notion of American government's underpinnings in Christianity by purposefully erasing portions of them in order to reverse the meaning their author intended.

The chains Jefferson hoped men would be aroused to burst were the chains which religion had fettered them with: the idea that rulers ruled by Divine Right, and that rights originated from God and were best interpreted by God's emissaries.

While we contemplate the origins of this country, and on America's birthday enjoy the freedoms our Founders vouchsafed us, let us not forget the whole of who our Founders were and what they said; not merely the political uses to which their words can, with careful editing, be put.

  • 27 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.